|
I think that I have made myself clear.
And to simply say that my rejection of belief is a belief is not productive in any way, in terms of addressing the extent to which belief itself is far different than operating on tentative hypotheses, for example.
I have laid out a path of negating concepts in their reified, ossified, delusion-inducing state - the state that folks who proclaim belief in things adhere to.
It is a far different thing to go around claiming belief than it is to state that beliefs are infinitely problematic and should be avoided as much as possible. And the extent to which it is possible to avoid belief is far more than those who would simply argue that these are all just other beliefs will allow, it seems. I repeat that is semantic nonsense, useless, and undemonstrable.
I am no less in amazement now than I was before I started this thread. Why would anyone choose to believe anything?
__________________
create evolution
|