Ok, here's what I don't understand.
According to the theory of relativity, the closer an object comes to travelling at the speed of light, the slower it moves through time, until at the speed of light time stops. So wouldn't light have an infinite velocity? velocity is distance\time and if time equals zero the velocity becomes infinite.
Since light obviously has a measurable velocity and does not travel instantaneously, I'm going to assume that the flow of time just becomes extremely close to zero at the speed of light, now this is where it gets a little tricky: Since we are not travelling at near light speeds, we observe time at close to what we assume is it's normal passage, now light(travelling at light speed) comes whizzing by us, So my question is, Is it really travelling as fast as it appears to be? We observe light as travelling at 186,282.4 miles per second, but that is a second as we observe it, what about time as it affects the photon? Wouldn't that second of observation to us be a couple of hours(just picking a random time frame) to the photon due to the relative slowing of time? Wouldn't the photon actually be travelling at 186,282.4 miles per couple of hours? Due to the relative time rates, it could travel for a couple of hours, but to our perspective have only travelled for one second. So the closer you come to the speed of light, less velocity you need because you gain more time to travel.
I hope that wasn't to messy, if it doesn't make any sense let me know and I'll try to rephrase it.