|
That's just false. Mr P could have chosen not-A, he just didn't choose that way. In other words, it's up to Mr. P. I've said it before on these boards -- foreknowledge does not, in any way, hinder freedom. Freedom just means it's up to me; the fact that someone else, whether it's a human being or God, knows what I'm going to do has no effect on my ability to do it.
You make another point, that what Mr. P does is determined, though indirectly, by God's actions. You have to say more, since what we do determines indirectly each other's actions all the time. Say you come over to my house, and I offer you a beer. You freely choose to accept that beer. Now, my offering you the beer indirectly determines your taking the beer, since you would not have taken the beer if I had not offered. But no one would say that, for that reason, you weren't free. Similarly, God put Eric in circumstances where Eric would buy the iguana. But that doesn't mean that Eric wasn't free not to buy the iguana any more than you weren't free to decline the proferred beer.
__________________
"Die Deutschen meinen, daß die Kraft sich in Härte und Grausamkeit offenbaren müsse, sie unterwerfen sich dann gerne und mit Bewunderung:[...]. Daß es Kraft giebt in der Milde und Stille, das glauben sie nicht leicht."
"The Germans believe that power must reveal itself in hardness and cruelty and then submit themselves gladly and with admiration[...]. They do not believe readily that there is power in meekness and calm."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
|