Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FoolThemAll
What you did was show that the wording used by the plaintiffs is consistent with an opposing views of the case. Not that it was inconsistent with Ustwo's interpretation of the wording.
|
Not quite. What I did was show that a headline of "Declaration of Independence banned in Calif School" is not even what the people bringing the lawsuit have claimed in their own PR. And there has been no claim by any party involved that "the very documents of our nations founding are being modified or banned to fit PC correctness in schools", as Ustwo so blithely mentioned.