|
Some dont want their kids watching it so they call it offensive. But they some damn liars because it's not offending their kids nor them. If they are actually offended by 'their kids watching nudity and sex', then they should be a parent and just teach their kids to not watch it. If they cant simply teach their kids to just not watch something, then that's their problem. They shouldnt take their lack of being a parent towards their kids or lack of being able to teach their kids things out on the rest of us.
It is something though when certain people may openly say things to kids like "life brought into this world is the most beautiful thing", but they wont openly say to those kids "having sex, which can bring life into this world, is the most beautiful thing" when in fact it sure does take sex to bring life into this world.
The facts of life surely cant harm any kid.
And then we've got the morally religious type folks--where it sure is something--because there is violent content throughout the bible. Do these kinds of folks think that the violent content in the bible is a sinful abomination or not? If not, why not? Do they think that the violent content throughout the bible is suitable for children? If they got time to get the FCC to penalize networks for the content of nudity and sexual content, then why dont these morally religious folks have the very bible censored? And censor it not just for their sake, but mainly for the kids sake they're teaching it to. Hell, does the God they beleive in got more against sex than violence? I thought these morally religous folks taught that a sin is a sin in God's eyes, where no sin is greater than the other.
|