SecretMethod70

Anyone read this thread? The first paragraph has been quoted http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showthr...65#post1530065 I'll add some more once I gain access to the rest of the article.

Anyway, there's something important that's being forgotten here. Whatever you feel like believing about creationism, I think 99% of us can agree that evolution is, at least, much more scientifically sound and proven. Now, if you want to say that evolution existing is not a fact or that creationism is not proven entirely wrong, it doesn't matter so long as you can understand that evolution is FAR more proven than creationism to the point where we at least know that science is moving towards something like evolution and away something like creationism. (As has been said, when there is an evolutionary theory that explains A through Z, it will look more like the evolutionary theory that explains A through Y and not like creationist theory).

So, with all that in mind comes the simple fact: there is not enough TIME to teach creationism and make an "example" of the scientific method out of it. Many of the posts I've read here could make one think that education takes place in a vacuum of time or something. There are limits. Likewise, there's not enough time to go into details about evolution to "prove" it to students who are not willing to accept it. So, all one really needs to accept is that evolution has a crapload more going for it than creationism. And I don't care WHAT you want to define "theory" as; it does.

__________________
Le temps détruit tout

"Musicians are the carriers and communicators of spirit in the most immediate sense." - Kurt Elling