Thread: Taxes
View Single Post
Old 11-28-2004, 01:58 AM   #23 (permalink)
madsenj37
Still searching...
 
madsenj37's Avatar
 
Location: NorCal For Life
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianna
havn’t you folks heard of the working poor? Living at or below the poverty line is not an indication of laziness -- often quite the opposite. in the USA service employees (maids, waitresses, retail workers, meat packers, etc) are paid minimum wage to do exhausting physical labor for often over 40 hours a week (at 40 hours a week on minimum wage an employee will earn $10712 before taxes the poverty line for one person living in the lower 48 states is $8,980 for two people it is $12,120). ... The fact of the matter is that we enjoy cheap goods and corporations enjoy hearty profits all at the expense of the working poor and their families. If companies were farced to pay a living wage we could drastically reduce the cost of social programs -- but until that happens I see no reasonable way to advocate letting poor children go hungry so that you can keep your money.
Where to start? First of all, these people are unskilled laborers. I will not argue that most of them work very hard. They have to. Anyone can do their job, they do not have skills that are in such high demand that only certain people can do said jobs.

A living wage is a bad idea. It makes everything more expensive. So these people will be paid more, but they will have to pay more for everything they buy. Their higher wages will drive prices up. And/Or less people will be hired, because companies can only afford to pay so much. More people will be jobless and having to work two jobs whenever possible. More people will be on welfare, since unskilled jobs will be harder to get.

I do agree that many companies could pay their workers better, but which ones? At what times? As for corparations, their profits only make up 9% of the nations income distribution. They use this for later ventures and business expenses. Proprietors make up another 9%. These small business owners make as much as corparations. Are they to blame, too? 18% is not that much considering only 9% is corparations. Rents are 2% and interest is 8%. 72% of income goes to wages and salaries. Out of that 72%, the top 10% pay 64% of the taxes and the top 50% pay 96% of taxes. I do not know where you get your information, but I get mine from my textbook, which uses statistics from 2002.
__________________
"Only two things are certain: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not certain about the universe."
-- Albert Einstein
madsenj37 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360