Host,
To be honest, I don't follow how my statements "neatly mesh" with anything you've posted.
And as for name calling, I will stand behind what I said and restate that anyone who believes that Kerry actually won the election has taken an unreasonable position in light of current evidence. In other words, given what we know, believing Kerry won is as unreasonable as believing that there was a second shooter on the grassy knoll, that aliens crashed in Roswell and that Neil Armstrong never went to the moon.
Is it possible that evidence could surface that could make such a belief reasonable?
Yes, of course. Many things are
possible, but
probable, it doesn't look that way.
So what then do you call someone who blindly takes such a position and holds it without even acknowledging the untenable nature of it?
I call them the loony fringe and will continue to do so.
I also note that I specifically addressed your links that "meshed" by saying that I acknowledge that there were irregularities and that we should be concerned.
I believe that is one of the valuable side effects of "The Fringe". By their bulldoggedness (is that a word?
), they can force us to look at problems that
do need solving, such as the possible problems with electronic voting.