View Single Post
Old 11-23-2004, 03:20 PM   #51 (permalink)
KMA-628
....is off his meds...you were warned.
 
KMA-628's Avatar
 
Location: The Wild Wild West
Well, I was hoping for an argument posed in someone's own words, not links to articles written by someone else (I don't do this for a living either, it is merely a "hobby").

Of the links, only one dealt with tax reform and it doesn't deal with the type of plan I am proposing. The other links are articles I read some time ago denigrating tax cuts. Tax cuts are not the argument here. Plus, the articles are devoid of some very important information relevant to the argument they are making, which is a totally different topic than being discussed here (in other words, they won't fly with me - case in point, article #3, referring to declining corporate tax revenue compares pre 9/11 to post 9/11. It completely ignores any mention of a recession or of any of the economic effects--of which there were many-- of 9/11. It also fails to mention that personal income tax revenue has gone up considerably--anyway, as I said, a different argument)

The best part about the first link is that it mentions that there isn't any empiracle evidence to support a "flat tax". Well, duh. There isn't a similar system to use as evidence, so, obviously there isn't any empiracle evidence. What kind of evidence did we have in 1908 when the current system was put into place? Or after WWII when it was enormously expanded? But we did it anyway, didn't we?

Let me try again, maybe someone else will answer:

If the plan I am referring to will hurt the middle-class more than they are being hurt now, how will that be? As I have stated before, I used myself as an example (and no, I am not posting the numbers--I did, however, post hypothetical numbers that are similar to mine) and have come out on the positive side in this argument. Since I am solidly middle-class, how will I get hurt?

If there are serious problems or things that need to be considered regarding a consumption tax, I really, really want to hear them.

Please make your argument specific to the points I mentioned and please make the argument in your own words, backed up with links if you so desire. Anyone can post a link, I would like someone to join this discussion that has thought about this idea and has a well-formulated opinion about it.

Last edited by KMA-628; 11-23-2004 at 03:22 PM..
KMA-628 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360