Quote:
Originally Posted by Manx
Replacing it with a consumption tax is out of the question. First, I have read some analysis of such a tax system that demonstrates the rate would exceed 30%. Second, and more important, it does nothing but shift the tax burden to the lower-middle and lower classes. There are certain things in life that everyone purchases or are essential requirements. Low-mid and lower classes spend most of the income on these things. Upper class spend essentially none of their income of these things. Lower classes will then be able to afford less of these essential items while the upper classes will simply export their purchasing of high-ticket items, shelter those purchases in a business, or transfer ownership via some new loop hole.
|
If the rich don't spend their money, why should they be taxed on it? What's the point in having money if you can't spend it? It's just pieces of paper that is worthless unless you can do something with it.
Stealing from the rich to give to the poor is a sure-fire way to ensure that there's large-scale animosity between the classes. And a man's hands do not belong in another man's pocket. It's also a recipe for disaster, in that the people realize that they can vote themselves "largesse from the public treasury".