View Single Post
Old 11-22-2004, 12:53 AM   #31 (permalink)
anti fishstick
Post-modernism meets Individualism AKA the Clash
 
anti fishstick's Avatar
 
Location: oregon
Blah, well most of the time, I am "afraid" to voice my thoughts/opinions but here goes:


Quote:
Originally Posted by filtherton
What i'm afraid of is falling victim to an out of touch, disney-esque, idealized image that our society has of love. Right now for me that means completely abandoning my society's oft unquestioned concept of what it means to be in a successful romantic relationship.

What Disney-esque image do you speak of? Does that mean a throwback to the 50s perfect, happy "white picket fence" family? Because society is becoming so out of touch with that idea in itself that what you are proposing with polygamy being ideal to you is not uncommon at all, by any means. If you think you are rebelling to unquestioned norms, and more and more people are right there with you, is that really rebelling? We are living in a postmodern world in which the reality around us is constantly changing. The "norms" aren't really norms anymore because even the norms are changing. In fact, I think more and more people are going to find themselves in "open" relationships or swinger relationships or at least seriously think about it/want it as this trend picks up. Our American society is very individualistic and this may be where the polygamous idea is coming from.

Quote:
Originally Posted by filtherton
Most interpersonal relationships involve some form of compromise. Polyamory is just a different set of boundaries, with a different set of compromises.
I don't understand... he is saying that compromises are true in any caring relationship, so what are you defending here? It seems like you care about your primary partner because there are obviously feelings there. We know there are different sets of compromises for any different models. Also, why do you think that monogamous relationships are inherently codependent? They don't have to be, and a healthy "ideal" monamagous relationship is more along the lines of interdependency, which is a big difference. You have to constantly re-evaluate your feelings and communicate effectively for a healthy, monogamous relationship to work also.

First of all, there is no "perfect" Disney-esque relationship, it does not exist except in our minds. Relationships take work, no matter what model you choose to take (polygamous, monagamous, etc.) Codependent relationships tend to function when one person is unhealthily attached to someone else for the wrong reasons. They define their self-worth based on external sources like the relationship. This puts the person in a position of powerlessness and the other person having all or most of the power in a relationship. The codependent partner has no control because they have given away power over self-esteem. Their self-esteem is *defined* by the relationship.

Interdependency is about mutual partnership and giving another person *some* power with our feelings. The dynamics of codependent vs. interdependent relationships are very different. Interdependent relationships are much more balanced (although not perfect). Of course, when we care about someone, and allow ourselves to be vulnerable in any way to another person, we are giving them some power with our feelings. Interdependency is normal and natural and happens in many monogamous relationships.

Quote:
The only thing one can't get from a polyamorous relationship that one can get from a monogamous one is monogamy itself.
You keep saying this and I do agree that some people just don't seem to be fit for monogamous relationships, or marriage for that matter. But why are you asking to justify monogamy when it seems like you are just trying to justify polygamy? So far, I haven't heard any good reason why polygamy still supports the same love, respect and committment, trust, growth, etc. that comes from a monogamous relationship because those dynamics would be completely different in a polygamous relationship. Leaving a monogamous relationship and switching to a polygamous one would change everything. Like wilbjammin said, you would have to change your philosophy, and everything you knew about the relationship would have to change to accommodate to other people.

If your claim is really true, then doesn't that mean that codependency could still exist in a polygamous relationship? If your goal is to get away from codependency by trying different relationship models than the society standard/ideal, then I don't think you'll get very far. Codependency is still codependency no matter what relationship you are in. The fight to end codependent relationships is really a fight to end dysfunctional cycles within yourself. It seems to me as if you are trying to gain control, as well as a sense of individualism by entering polygamous relationships. Trying different relationship models could work, but it won't escape any problems that monogamous relationships could have.
__________________
And the day came when the risk to remain tight in a bud was more painful than the risk it took to blossom.
~Anais Nin
anti fishstick is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360