|
Not necessarily saying that they would turn to violence (that goes against the hypothetical), but it just goes along with the concept of peace at any cost. Its ridiculous and hypocritical, beyond that when you ask if everyone were willing to prove me wrong then there would be absolutely no reason to have to murder in the first place. But this is again going outside the hypothetical. The point still remains that its morally abhorent and no peace created in such a way could ever last because its based upon violence. Along the same lines, you can't really expect world peace to ever be able to be achieved through murder/violence. Honestly, if there was world peace that world's inhabitants would shun the killing of any number of people and since we are hold that world up to the ideal perhaps we should strive for that type of morality.
__________________
"The courts that first rode the warhorse of virtual representation into battle on the res judicata front invested their steed with near-magical properties." ~27 F.3d 751
|