I know this is a couple days old now, but I've just finished reading right thru the whole thing and I have to say it was an excellent discussion. I really enjoyed reading that
Prosequence felt he could justafiably call EVERYONE ELSE in this discussion ignorant and close-minded, as I did not see a single post which supported his idea (that idea being that evolution and creationism are both equally theories/not theories/whatever). I have to say to Prosequence that he is the one who appears close-minded. I have much respect for someone who will stand up for thier own beleifs, but maybe in this case Prosequence would like to make some effort to rectify this blind single-mindedness, as it's very unbecoming.
And I'm STILL waiting for someone to provide this large list of physical, testable evidence for creationism. Anyone? Anyone at all, please? I would very much like to see this list.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by hannukah harry
personally i think it's much more likely that man created god than the otherway around.
|
Ding! I'm sure any christian person would tell you that this is what happened for the Greek, Indian, Norse, Japanese, Maori and Incan gods and systems of gods (and the rest of course). All have equal evidence (none/very little), so I find it highly likely that the Christian idea of God is simply another fabrication created to help people come to terms with stuff that happens.
My opinion, no offense intended to anyone who holds these beleifs.
Lak