|
As many people have already pointed out homosexuality is either natural or nothing human is natural. Homosexuality occurs in the animal kingdom and beyond that, by definition if it is occuring at all it must be natural. Even if we assume, for the sake of argument alone, that it is unnatural then so what? Why does it being unnatural lead to the conclusion that it must be stopped? This is poor logic at best and downright untrue at worst.
__________________
"The courts that first rode the warhorse of virtual representation into battle on the res judicata front invested their steed with near-magical properties." ~27 F.3d 751
|