View Single Post
Old 11-19-2004, 12:04 PM   #16 (permalink)
william
Psycho
 
william's Avatar
 
At what point is a child not a child? If I had a child affected by this, I'd be calling for their heads. They made the cake and handed it out randomly to whoever would take it. If they have enough know-how to bake the cake, they had to have some idea what they were doing when they added bleach. (What - that wasn't vinegar?)
To be charged as a terrorist seems a bit like Ashcroft gone to wild. But this was a totally f'd up situation. I'd expect the father to step up and blame it on anything except personal responsibility.
Which goes back to the original question - at what age is someone personally responsible? And if they have a problem like the father says, why is he not at fault for keeping a better eye on her?
And that's only 1/2 the equation, the girl did not act alone.
william is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73