Quote:
|
Originally Posted by smooth
Yes, we are all aware of your murderous fantasies by now.
The difference between your version of events with the facts is that physically threatening someone is not an appropriate method to convey dissent.
Intimidating or even threatening someone, as the Dixie Chics were, is not expressing ideas, it's barbaric and completely expected from someone like you who prefers violence to discussion.
Usually you quip back with war is peace or peace through war or something like that.
|
I suggest you reread my post, and notice where I stated the "due process of law" bit. That's not threatening somebody, that's saying the law should be enforced, by the people who we pay to enforce the law.