Quote:
|
Originally Posted by zen_tom
There can be no such thing as society if we are unable to trust the good intent of others. .
|
Basic human nature works against this argument. History has proven, over and over and over, that you cannot trust the good intent of others. Current events in every corner of the globe prove my point as well. While it is a noble idea, it is one that will never work on a small scale or a large scale.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by zen_tom
Yes there will always be one fool who doesn't understand that life is easier that way, and he will always end up having to be forcibly restrained by the civilised majority.
|
Unfortunately, it is never just "one fool". That category is filled with countless numbers.
As to the original question:
Neither work 100%, but deterrance will always work better then disarmament. Disarmament is a falacy, it has no effect on a threat. Take away the weapons and they will find some other means (i.e. a plane). Take away any type of means and they are still a threat through support of others who are a threat (i.e. monetary gifts to the families of terrorists).
At least with deterrance, you stand a better chance in the long run.