|
Is this thing on?
Creationism is "completely unsupported" as far as a claim to being a scientific theory, because no practitioners or advocates of "creation theory" have ever offered any general predictions about the way the world or organism should (and should NOT) be. Without any predictive power, we can't go look at the facts available and go "Ah, see? This is exactly as the creationists predicted... one point for their side." or if we find something that would be improbable in a created world say "Ah, see, this is far too common for creationism to be correct."
It's not falsifiable, which is a requirement for a hypothesis --> scientific theory.
Creationism is "completely unsupported" because it is not outlined in a sufficently rigorous manner to claim any fact as evidence.
__________________
Simple Machines in Higher Dimensions
|