|
I think CS Lewis put it best:
"A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic--on the level with a man who says he is a poached egg--or else he would be the devil of hell. You must make your choice. Either he was and is the Son of God: or else a madman or something worse. You can shut him up for a fool, you can spit at him and kill him as a demon; or you can fall at his feet and call Him Lord and God. But let us not come with any patronizing nonsense about his being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to"
I voted for Son of God. After reading the New Testament many times I can't see a case for His being a lunatic, his statements and insights just don't add up to insanity. I can't vote for the devil option because His teachings don't add up to that either.
Remember His claim of being the Son of God, The Judge of mankind, the only way to heaven etc. Those are the claims that need explaining. His miracles are secondary, because they are explained by the answer to the first question. If He was the Son of God, they happened. If He was insane, they are fabricated. If he was the devil, they could have happened as well.
I have to say though, that people who think they can reasonably argue for or against anything, without having seriously investigated it, don't have a foot to stand on.
|