Quote:
Originally Posted by irateplatypus
by your own admission, defining marriage as being between a man and a woman was given tremendous support. if it has tremendous support... when does the issue stop becoming part of the "religious right agenda" and start becoming the national agenda? seems you're cutting off the branch you're standing on.
|
I'm personally scared of the "religious right agenda" becoming national agenda. Writing discrimination into the constitution and withholding 1048 rights from homosexuals that are granted to heterosexuals doesn't sit well.
I honestly don't care if 49 states passed anti-homosexuality laws. I would still consider it wrong and do my all to battle against it.