I've been reading through the John Titor page, almost at the end now. I think it's a fascinating read, but I personally don't believe it because he goes to great lengths to explain that he doesn't particularly care if we believe him. From what little I understand, it seems that everything that can happen, will happen, so I don't see why he can't give out stock tips? What would be the harm?
All the science both makes sense and doesn't make sense to me, as it's all just technical jargon that I can't possibly begin to get my head around.
He tells us things that will happen in the future, things that won't be proven or disproven for years to come. Only now, four years or so after he started posting, can we even begin to see if he was right.
If he really didn't want us to benefit by telling us things (such as when earthquakes or bombings happen), why didn't he say something like "911"? Something vague enough that before the attacks we wouldn't understand, but straight afterwards we'd say 'Ah, that's what he meant!' Saying '911' on the message board wouldn't have a hope in hell of preventing the September 11 attacks only six months later so nobody on Earth would benefit from him hinting about it. I cannot imagine for a second that somebody on those boards would see '911' and then stay away from New York city six months later.
Considering the September 11 attacks are arguably the number 1 trigger for the conflicts that the US and the West are involved in now, and he says that the current conflicts are the lead-ups to WW3 and the US Civil War (any day now, it seems), it makes sense that he would make some reference, even a heavily disguised one, to the events that cause the wars in the future.
And yes, to those who don't believe it, all this talk is a waste of time but whether I believe it or not is overshadowed by the conversation it generates.
|