Why does it require logic? It's a false analogy. We're talking natural rights vs. privledges.
But, lets just consider it as a right.
Logic for you:
All United States Citizens have the right to be married.
A gay man is a United States citizen.
A gay man has the right to be married.
Yes, that is a true statement if marriage is a right and it's parallel with civil rights laws.
No human should be a slave to another man.
A black man is a human.
A black man should not be a slave to another man.
Personally, I think the government is more justified than eliminating marriage than eliminating the abolition of slavery. Maybe you don't?
I've always wondered that if the argument for gay marriage is that the government has no right to dictate private behavior, then why are they not trying to just get legal recognition of marriage to be eliminated?
|