11-04-2004, 08:36 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
*edited for content*
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cthulu23
I'd say that the reasons listed are mainly conservative projections of what they think the other side is feeling and bear little resemblance to any majority opinion. They sure do make the opposition look bad, though, don't they?
Speaking of whining....
|
A) http://americanassembler.com/feature...e_averages.htm
B)
Quote:
Liberals have NO issues with a fundamentalist living their life as a fundamentalist. It is the fundamentalist who wishes to control the liberal.
Projection of personal morals is unacceptable.
And further, it is not scapegoating. Bush won this election because liberals are more likely to live up to being a liberal: the non-projection of personal morals. As such, they are not as easily roused from sleep. Fundamentalist Christians eagerly desire their own beliefs to be shared, and forced, on others. This election was a moral referendum on our country - and because of the nature of the philosophy's of the opposing groups, the fundamentalists triumphed. And now it is a "mandate".
|
http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showthr...t+gay+marriage
C) Does this one really need any justification?
D)
Quote:
|
Diebold, one of the three major companies, is run by Walden “Wallie” O’Dell, a big Bush supporter. O’Dell said in a 2003 Republican fundraising letter that he is “committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year.” Diebold, headquartered in Canton, Ohio, has been selected as their voting machine provider by more than half of Ohio counties. The company’s take will be $31 million. And the CEO wants George Bush to win the election that his machines will be counting.
|
http://www.makethemaccountable.com/c...chineFraud.htm
So this is all just made up and blown out of proportion?
__________________
There are no absolute rules of conduct, either in peace or war. Everything depends on circumstances.
Leon Trotsky
|
|
|