Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Stompy
Why does this matter? I'm assuming you're talking about providing health care and whatnot? What is the difference then between a married couple who refuses to have children vs two women who (obviously) can't have children?
|
Which I personally don't think they should gain heath benefits either, but they have the option to have children. Honestly, I don't think any spouse should gain benefits, only children.
Quote:
|
It's not like they're walking around having gay sex in public. Therefore, they are not forcing any acceptance of "behavior" on others. What behavior are you referring to?
|
They are forcing people to accept same-sex relationships. They want that behaviour to be protected over other behaviours people might find objectionable. Just because sex is involved doesn't mean that it's any different than any other behavior. No other behavior set gains any special protection.