|
Now, given the shit Bush has had to handle in his term (aka... the economy had to fail at some point, cant stay at a boom forever. The shit in the middle east had to be dealt with... how is another issue, but it did have to be done, among other things) the real question is... did he do a better job then the next guy (Good Ole Gore).
I personally think he did. Cant really compare him to Clinton, because the conditions of the world were not the same.
Apples to Apples is such a hard thing to pull off at times, isnt it?
|