Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Stompy
Most people tend to forget that this isn't a "true unless disproved" country.
So saying, "Has ANYBODY heard ANYBODY say that Kerry's testimony was NOT used by the North Vietnamese for propaganda purposes and as a tool to further torture American POWs?" holds no water.
Can you prove that his statement WAS used in this manner?
|
Well, given that there were numerous people who were there that said it was indeed used, and NOBODY says it wasn't, I don't think there's much doubt about it.
Tell you what. Would you feel comfortable going to an arbitrator and representing that such a thing didn't happen, when confronted by the witnesses that said it DID happen, and that they were there, and had the documentation to back up their presence there?
Eyewitness testimony is indeed admissable in a court of law, and that's what "Stolen Honor" documented...