Quote:
|
Originally Posted by host
Bush has already demonstrated that he will order U.S. troops into harms way
when it is not absolutely necessary, and at least 1122 of our brave and dedicated soldiers have been killed as a result, including at least eight fine
young U.S. Marines over this weekend. Just what is it that you believe Kerry
might do as commander in chief that could be a greater betrayal of the trust,
respect, and allegiance of the members of our military than that? Why would you
be happier to serve under a commander who deliberately avoided combat service
when he was your age, than a commander who volunteered to not only serve
in combat, but to serve in a unit with an immediately past history of repeatedly
engaging the enemy while suffering a high casualty rate to its own personnel?
thefictionweliv, at your young age, are you certain that your assessment is
superior to the opinion of these 36 editorial boards? You, more than most
Americans, have a great deal at stake as far as the outcome of this election.
Thank you for your service and may God bless you and protect you.
|
I'm more concerned about Kerry's policy on North Korea, N. Korea is not going to listen to listen to unilateral talks with the United States, that is the method Kerry said he is going to use and on the Today show said he would support a first strike on N. Korea if diplomacy doesn't work. This would make Iraq look like a firecracker, Bush at least supports talks involving China and Russia which would be far more likely to get North Korea to budge, through our attempt at controling politics in the Middle East and the Vietnam war , I'm confident that N. Korea probably feels secure enough to face war on one front rather than giving into our demands, involve China and Russia, 2 more fronts and you might have something to work with, that is why I would hope that anyone but Kerry wins this election.