Quote:
Originally Posted by daswig
It's pretty simple. Most of them are distortions of the truth, and/or come from extremely partisan sources. BTW, who did the source magazine endorse? Could it be ....John Kerry?
|
I would buy into your argument MAYBE but I see in the compilation the WSJ, White House, Gov't agencies, Fox News and some pretty right winged sources being quoted.
Anyone at any given time can dispute some facts and warp them to their agenda. But when you have at least 100 from different sources some from the opposing side that prove your point, then you can't argue and you can't warp. You maybe able to take a few but......
Aw well, noone believes facts and graphs and parallels in history until it bites them in the ass and they see it first hand.