View Single Post
Old 10-27-2004, 08:33 AM   #67 (permalink)
roachboy
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
for what it's worth, i see nationalism as a collective mental disorder.

in the case of this election, i do not see what possible problem there could really be with all and any attempts to inform american voters that there is much at stake in this election, that bush is widely viewed around the world as having been a disaster as a president not only for the americans but for the entire global order.

in this case, nationalism seems to be invoked in order to enable folk to not think about what they might find to be unpleasant, to not introduce realilties that might force folk to think about bush in a frame of reference his party does not control.

to do this, the argument that has to stick is that the u.s. is at some level seperate from the rest of the world.
an idea that is ridiculous empirically and a gateway to fiasco politically.

i still maintain that it is defense of the otherwise outmoded notion of nationalism that explains more than anything else the entire iraq war farce, explains the republican's vitriolic actions under clinton (they know full well that clinton was not far from them ideologically, but he was too much a fan of multilateral agreements, too much willing to further the process of integrating the american economy into the global one--he did not pay adequate attention to tending the obsolete signifers of nation that conservative politics depends on)

dont believe me on iraq?
read the project for a new american century website--any critical reading of it prompts the argument that i am making to emerge clearly.

the bush administration can be seen as peforming a kind of neurotic reaction to the implications of a globalizing capitalism that they cannot criticize, that they have to see as an unqualified good--faced with this, and with the institutional implications of it (look at conventional conservative parties in europe--the writing is on the wall and the right knows it) they prefer to erect a fantasy of nationalism and use it to prop up their own political framework.

but maybe people prefer simple fictions to complex realities.
it fits well within an information context where news is understood as a commodity, where information is framing for advertising.

better not to think about it too much.
but that changes nothing about the status and function of nationalism.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360