View Single Post
Old 10-26-2004, 11:07 AM   #74 (permalink)
host
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by athletics
If it was, then I didn't see it. On their tv coverage it was all about missing weapons. No mention on the time frame.

In other news...there is a big domestic October Surprise that is going to break open in the next few days. The Bush administration has lost a river that flows through Arizona, leaving a very grand canyon. How do you lose a river? Poor environment policies and Halliburton, thats how.
Friends, we're experiencing what it must have been like to try to stay
informed if you were living in old Soviet Russia. Bushco seems desperate to
spin the missing explosives story out of it's realm of responsibility.......

drudgereport.com led with a large lettered link at the top of the web pages
yesterday that an NBC news reporter embedded with U.S. invasion forces
has reported that the explosives were "already gone when U.S. troops arrives
at al qaqaa on April 10, 2003. CNN picked up the story and displsyed it as it's
headline story on it's web site last night until 8:00 AM EST today. My skepticism
increased when I observed that, outside of a video report of this story, there
was nothing on MSNBC's website comparable to CNN's feature.

My opinion is that CNN was involved in a transparent effort to aid the Bush
administration in minimizing the fallout from the explosives story by featuring
an NBC reporter's claim that Bushco did not even have an opportunity to
secure the explosives in the first place, at the same time NBC news did not
have enough confidence that the story was signifigant enough to lead with.

The main weakness in the story below is that I have posted three stories
above, including one from the state department's own website that establish
that U.S. troops were at the El Qa Qaa with the 3rd Infantry Division on
April 4, 2003, 6 days before the NBC reporter Lai Ling, embedded with the
101st Airborne division arrived there.
<a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/world/iraq/20030404-1742-war-chemicalfinds.html">http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/world/iraq/20030404-1742-war-chemicalfinds.html</a>
<a href=" http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,83252,00.html"> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,83252,00.html</a>
<a href="http://usembassy-australia.state.gov/hyper/2003/0404/epf504.htm">http://usembassy-australia.state.gov/hyper/2003/0404/epf504.htm</a>
Quote:
<a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/breaking_news/10019672.htm?1c">http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/breaking_news/10019672.htm?1c</a>
Posted on Tue, Oct. 26, 2004
Click here to find out more!

Embedded NBC reporter says no indication U.S. soldiers searched an Iraqi site for explosives now missing

NEW YORK (AP) - An NBC News reporter embedded with a U.S. army unit that seized an Iraqi installation three weeks into the war said Tuesday that she saw no signs that the Americans searched for the powerful explosives that are now missing from the site.

Reporter Lai Ling Jew, who was embedded with the Army's 101st Airborne, Second Brigade, said her news team stayed at the Al-Qaqaa base for about 24 hours.

``There wasn't a search,'' she told MSNBC, an NBC cable news channel. ``The mission that the brigade had was to get to Baghdad. That was more of a pit stop there for us. And, you know, the searching, I mean certainly some of the soldiers head off on their own, looked through the bunkers just to look at the vast amount of ordnance lying around.

``But as far as we could tell, there was no move to secure the weapons, nothing to keep looters away.''

On Monday night, NBC reported that its embedded crew said U.S. troops did discover significant stockpiles of bombs, but no sign of the missing HMX and RDX explosives.............

.......That raised the possibility that the explosives had disappeared before U.S. soldiers could secure the site in the immediate invasion aftermath.

However, Iraq's Ministry of Science and Technology told the IAEA the explosives disappeared sometime after coalition forces took control of Baghdad on April 9, 2003.

The NBC team accompanied the 101st Airborne at Al-Qaqaa the following day -- on April 10, 2003.

Lai Ling told MSNBC that there was no talk among the 101st of securing the area after they left.

She said the roads were cut off ``so it would have been very difficult, I believe, for the looters to get there.''
The drudgereport.com emphasis on this story yesterday and the CNN
followup "major headline" treatment seems to reveal a transparent CNN
effort to run a damage contol operation for Bush and his campaign. Much
information at these links below to further strenghten this accusation:
<a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2004_10_24.php#003804">http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2004_10_24.php#003804</a>
<a href="http://www.dkosopedia.com/index.php/Al_Qaqaa_Weapons_Cache">http://www.dkosopedia.com/index.php/Al_Qaqaa_Weapons_Cache</a>

Last edited by host; 10-26-2004 at 11:13 AM..
host is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360