Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Superbelt
No, the military wouldn't. There is plenty of evidence of Bush not listening to the military commanders, both at home and on the field. He chose to make the decisions, as commander in chief, that go counter to those under him.
|
But does he make battlefield decisions and troop deployments?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Superbelt
and: I believe that the senate inquiries handled that. There were no weapons, or programs. Saddam had hopes of building one some day when the sanctions were all gone, but as of our invasion he had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. His lack of proof that he had weapons were intended as a smokescreen to make himself look dangerous to Iraq's enemy, Iran. If Iran knew that they were relatively defenseless, nothing would have stopped Iran from overrunning Iraq and deposing, and killing Saddam.
|
What about all the weapons documented from after the Gulf War, before he kicked out the inspectors? You know, the ones that all those sanctions were put in place to make him come out with, and prove he destroyed them, but refused to? He has nothing NOW, and that's exactly my point. Did he pour them across the sands? Did he sell them? Inquiring minds want to know!