Quote:
Originally Posted by daswig
So how many WMDs did Saddam have to possess in order to be considered to be in possession of WMDs? 50 obviously isn't enough for you. How many would be? 100? 500? 5000? 50,000? If just 5 of the sulphur-mustard WMDs had been used in a major subway system in the US, how many casualties could we have expected to suffer? How many casualties in the US would have been acceptable to you?
|
This is very much the separate realities we are talking about. Those scraps that were found were old, decomissioned and nowhere near the intended *true* targets. If you wanna justify everything this country has gone through and the debt we are in now with *that* don't be surprised if a ton of people disagree with you.. vehemently.