Quote:
|
Originally Posted by daswig
So how many WMDs did Saddam have to possess in order to be considered to be in possession of WMDs? 50 obviously isn't enough for you. How many would be? 100? 500? 5000? 50,000? If just 5 of the sulphur-mustard WMDs had been used in a major subway system in the US, how many casualties could we have expected to suffer? How many casualties in the US would have been acceptable to you?
|
These were inactive, abandoned weapons, not some secret stash of weapons destined for the subways of NY.
You want a number? How about 53? Give me 53 actual, real weapons that at least fit the criteria of the people that you say that you support on this issue, not a dusty collection of poor excuses.
There is also no proof that Iraq had any plans on attacking the US with WMDs or supplying WMDs to terrorists. Once again, even the White House isn't claiming this anymore.