Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cthulu23
WAS is the operative word. We didn't invade Iraq because of the munitions that they HAD but because of the supposedly vast stockpiles that they were currently in possession of.
|
So how many WMDs did Saddam have to possess in order to be considered to be in possession of WMDs? 50 obviously isn't enough for you. How many would be? 100? 500? 5000? 50,000? If just 5 of the sulphur-mustard WMDs had been used in a major subway system in the US, how many casualties could we have expected to suffer? How many casualties in the US would have been acceptable to you?