Quote:
|
Originally Posted by daswig
I notice you quote the executive summary, and not the main report. Why is that? You still didn't answer the question. How many WMDs did we have to find in Iraq to conclude that Saddam still had them? Wasn't the 53 confirmed WMDs enough? What's the magical number?
|
I quoted the summary because the salient points are already summarized (obviously). Are you insinuating that the executive summary is a misrepresentation of the facts contained in the uncondensed documents?
The WMDs in question were "old," "abandoned" and no longer chemically active. There is a reason that the Bush administration does not seem as excited about the find as some of the right wing internet elements. Again, if their discovery is so damning why isn't the White House communicating the same message that you are?