Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cthulu23
The WSJ's financial reporting may be consistently excellent but their editorial stance is extremely slanted and biased. That may be par for the course as far as editorials go but it hardly qualifies it for inclusion as a primary source. Editorials are opinions and are not hampered by any burden
of proof.
|
WSJ is as IMHO as unbiased as they come- there always seems to be one damming Bush. Thursdays paper for example always includes Albert R. Hunt.
That said all editorials are biased- I just think WSJ is the most fair as far as allowing point-counter point- they dont FAIL to list counter arguments in letters to editors in regards to editorials.