Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aliali
The only source you have cited is the WSJ, which is widely recognized as a conservative publicaiton. so that is not a valid source.
The WSJ does not deserve this kind of attack. Its reporting is consistently great. If the facts don't matter and it's ok to just attack the messenger, what publication, if any, can be considered a valid source?
|
The WSJ's financial reporting may be consistently excellent but their editorial stance is extremely slanted and biased. That may be par for the course as far as editorials go but it hardly qualifies it for inclusion as a primary source. Editorials are opinions and are not hampered by any burden
of proof.