10-21-2004, 08:17 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Junkie
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OpieCunningham
Not that I am defending the Electoral College system in any way, but this is not a good idea. All this will do is dillute the intentions of the popular vote by averaging out the votes in any given state and assigning a disproportionate value to those votes.
For example, lets take two states, A and B. They each have 10 EVs and 20 million people.
If State A ends with a 11,000,000 to 9,000,000 popular vote, each candidate will receive (depending on how the values are averaged) either 5 EV or 6 for one and 4 for the other.
If State B ends with a 10,000,000 to 10,000,000 popular vote, each candidate will again receive 5 EV.
State A will either be eliminating the value of 1 million votes for each candidate or eliminating the value of 1 million votes for one candidate while doubling the value of 1 million votes for the other candidate (a 6 to 4 EV breakdown would imply a 12mil to 8 mil popular vote).
|
And this is worse then eliminating 9 million votes for one canidate while giving them to the other?
|
|
|