View Single Post
Old 10-21-2004, 11:50 AM   #20 (permalink)
stingc
Psycho
 
Location: PA
Quote:
Originally Posted by maleficent
some light reading for y'all
http://www.amnesty.org/ailib/intcam/femgen/fgm1.htm
http://www.religioustolerance.org/fem_cirm.htm
http://www.africa2000.com/bndx/circum.html
http://www.eskimo.com/~gburlin/female.html

and this site is somewhat in favor of it
(Somewhate NSFW photos -- but in a medical context - not a tawdry context_
http://www.noharmm.org/femcirctech.htm
I found the last link quite interesting. Despite using the same words - female circumcision - it is talking about something completely different than the other sites. For those who don't want to read, it is a medical article suggesting the removal of part of the clitoral hood to allow the clitoris to be more easily stimulated. It is being recommended for those women (not babies) who cannot have an orgasm. This seems quite logical, and has the opposite intention of the procedures (rightfully) condemned in the other articles under the exact same name.
stingc is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62