View Single Post
Old 10-20-2004, 03:34 PM   #51 (permalink)
stingc
Psycho
 
Location: PA
Everyone seems stuck on very archaic concepts of mathematics. As a whole, it is not based on the concept of numbers, and is quite separate from requiring any type of physical reality.

I think it would be useful to describe how a modern mathematician works. They basically do two things. The first of these is to set out definitions. Assume the (abstract) existence of an object X satisfying logical properties (1), (2), ... Any object with these properties is given some arbitrary name. This process seems quite clearly to be invention.

Once everything has been defined, the mathematician then tries to find interesting (meaning nontrivial) relations between them. These properties are logically deduced using only the definitions already given.

It is a little harder to say whether this step should be called discovery or invention. One is given a set system, and is finding rules for it that weren't known before. This is very closely analogous to the physicist finding rules to describe the universe. Both systems obeyed those rules independently of the discoverer(/inventor)'s understanding. I would therefore say that this part of mathematics is discovery.

There is an obvious counter-argument though. In the case of mathematics, all theorems are logically contained in the definitions (which are invented). It may therefore be said that the theorems were invented at the same time as the definitions. The statement is then that the inventor was simply not smart enough to understand the depth of his creations. Although I can see the point of this argument, it seems to run against the most common usage of the words we're discussing.

So I think math is fundamentally about discovery, but not the same sort of discovery that the traditional sciences strive for. Scientists have but one universe to study. Mathematicians create their own, and produce a new one whenever they get bored. In this sense, math contains elements both of the arts and sciences.

More practically though (to those of us who would like to actually use math for something practical), it is best thought of as a highly developed form of logical argument.
stingc is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360