Thread: Bush and 1984
View Single Post
Old 10-20-2004, 10:31 AM   #107 (permalink)
roachboy
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
still dont know what you mean by truth in this context--i really dont---so to an extent discussion stalls out there.

when i said that there is no conspiracy, no discrete cabal pulling the strings behind the scenes and that could be invoked in order to show or demonstrate hegemony was being exersized, i meant only that. i didnt say anything (i dont think at least) about mechanisms..only that they could neither be proven as what they are or disproven as what they are based on the presence or absence of a cabal.

it seems self-evident that television is a fundamental mechanism for opinion management, for setting and controlling the parameters of "legitimate" debate---it seems self-evident that conservatives have been much better than anyone else in reducing their viewpoints to soundbites and in thereby having disproportionate access to the various forums for pseudo-debate that work as a substitute for meaningful debate in american pseudo-democracy. it is also pretty clear that this same medium operates to exclude/trivialize opposition.
all this without a particular cabal.
for television to occupy this role, it has to lean on (and presuppose) modes of sociability--that one acquires through the various institutions that shape you as a functional subject--these modes of sociablity are what enable a cultural system in whcih individual actors dominate themselves...which is a way of saying that as much as i dislike george w bush, he in no way invented this--his adminsitration simply exploited features of it in order to legitimate itself on the basis of paranoia, and to extend authoritarian tendencies already working in a particular direction.

it is the combination of the far right in power and the far right in a position of such influence over the terms of debate that makes this situation--2004, now--one that is geared toward authoritarian rule. a curious kind of authoritarian rule, one in which is seems mandatory to talk about how free and open things are. i was in a seminar like this once, in france: it ran like a kingdom in which a royal decree required that all subject talk about direct democracy. the contradiction of form and content is easier managed than you might think.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360