Quote:
|
Originally Posted by daswig
Please give me one good reason WHY I should provide you with one more single goddamned link. I gave you a pinpoint cite on the 53 WMDs discovered so far. No response from ANY of the Bush-bashers. I gave you cites and links for other things Saddam did which qualify as casus belli. Still no response from the Bush-bashers. I gave you links to two specific incidents where Kerry supporters beat Bush supporters for daring to speak out in a public forum that they entered into without theft by deception (which is what the women with tickets did....they lied to get tickets, claiming to be Bush supporters). Still no response from the Bush-bashers. So why exactly should I google shit for you any more???
|
You brought up the point therefore you should support it or back away from it.
If these 53 WMDs constitute the "smoking gun" that you think they do, why has the administration admitted that they haven't been able to find WMDs?
If your "casus belli" is so strong, why weren't those arguments used as a reason to invade Iraq? Maybe because the American people would never have supported an invasion for those reasons?
All of the arguments that you give for the war have been debated here many, many times. Maybe people are sick of arguing the same points over and over.