From FAIR:
Quote:
People voluntarily cooperating for the common good is "how business works"? Actually, it sounds more like socialism.
|
Actually, no it doesn't. In socialism people are told what to do with their ability to make money.
As for one-sided sourcing, this is not to be unexpected. Any "special" or "documentary" is going to have one sided sourcing if it's designed to promote a point. That's like saying I wrote a bad paper because I concentrated on mentioning the things that support my thesis statement as opposed to trying to disprove it.
Ultimately, I think it's sufficient to point out that if there were a clear answer to anything, we wouldn't have people debating economics ever now would we? We wouldn't have Nobel Laurates who support Libertarian economic policies and, just as many I'm sure, Nobel Laurates who reject them.
In the end, I support whatever gives ME more control over what to do with MY things.
And, again, I want to make it very clear that I know that my arguments for justifying the economics are not the best. I've said before, I'm concerned with my individual freedom moreso than the economic aspects. I think that all solutions should be sought within that realm.