View Single Post
Old 10-17-2004, 07:59 AM   #6 (permalink)
adysav
Insane
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ Happy
I countered his argument by saying that his criteria would segregate voting in terms of financial ability rather than intelligence as there are plenty of bright, well-informed people who did not or were unable to attend university, and that many of degrees on offer do not require that much brain-power in order to pass (see: Golf Studies at Southampton University).
There are also plenty of intelligent people who choose not to go, and a lot of people who go to spend a few years getting shit-faced at their parents expense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ Happy
But it did get me thinking. After all, there are plenty of uninformed, "intellectually challenged" (how's that for a PC term?) people who hold my fate and the fate of my country in their hands. How do they know what's best for the country?
They don't, and neither do you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ Happy
Should tabloid readers who simply regurgitate the views of the nation's rags be allowed to vote? Or those who base their views on "documentaries" made by the likes of Michael Moore? Or those people who know nothing about anything but will vote for a particular candidate because of a long standing and unjustifed party affiliation?
I'm glad it isn't up to you who is allowed to vote. Graduates automatically read broadsheets? Tabloid readers aren't capable of critical thinking?
Who do you trust when it comes to this kind of information? If there's a news source that is totally impartial then I don't know of it.
I would say knowledge of party policy is just as important as intelligence as you can't make a valid decision without the facts. Even then, how can you possibly know which parts of policy will actually take effect, which will be successful and which will just change.

The only way you could enforce the kind of thing you're talking about is by having the entire electorate take an exam before each election. People can vote for who they want for any reason they want, that is democracy. If the people currently in power held the view "you can't vote if you think differently to us", we'd be living in Stalin's Russia.
adysav is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360