|
Like I said, it's not the best definition, but it came to mind, and it's a damn sight better than the statistical definition. Anyways, depending which definition you use (and there are some that are more widely-used, speaking in academic circles), deviance can mean a lot of things. Despite this, just because behaviour is weird to you, it doesn't make it deviant. So you don't have to be a robot to be a non-deviant (although I'd classify myself as deviant with most definitions), just good at following rules.
Also, the robot thing is, again, dependent on who you talk to. There are a number of people who consider human beings to be simply biological robots.
|