Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mirevolver
The difference here is that the American people, if they so choose to have the power to pick a new leader. And by interfering with that process, the Guardian is violating the sovereign rights of the United States. I doubt the British would be happy if next year we started sending letters to them telling them to reelect Tony Blair.
|
There is a difference between interfering with the process and talking to someone. How exactly are they violating the sovereignty of the united states by writing letters? I'm sorry, but that's ridiculous. Maybe you'd be happy if the government completely shut out any form of foreign media and limited our internet access only to sites originating inside the 50 states so as not to allow any "interference" until after the election.