Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post

longbough · 10-14-2004, 12:18 PM

Whenever there's a discussion about defensive handgunning the public seems to be awash in more mythology than fact. This seems to be true for many gun owners as well as non-gun owners. So here're some basic facts I thought everyone ought to know.

With the exception of a good, penetrating head-shot most handgun caliber bullets are rarely capable of killing someone on the spot.
But the sole objective of using a gun in defense is not to "kill" but to “stop” a target that presents an imminent threat.

Two shots from a .45 to the chest has a high probability of stoppng a target only because of the neurological shock from acute traumatic injury to vital organs such as the heart and lungs. While such injuries may eventually result in death the intent is to incapacitate target so that it is no longer a threat.

The myths:

#1. “The cops didn’t have to shoot the subject 41 times.” Yes and no. If the body doesn't produce a reflexive neurocirculatory collapse after two rounds to the chest then the subject will still be standing. How can this happen? Under great stress extreme levels of epinephrine in an individual might be enough to “protect” them from shock. In a sense it acts to "override" the reflexive response. Often the subject is oblivious to the fact that they've been shot. The simple rule is that, if those first two rounds don’t do the trick, then the next one will have to be to the head.

Then why don't cops go for the "head shot" after a "failure to stop"? Police officers are trained to shoot center of mass. I suspect it’s because it would be “politically incorrect” for the public to know that each cop is trained to deliver head-shots. The public wouldn’t stand for it. While COM shots can be 96% effective there’s still 4% left standing.

#2. “Psychopaths and psychotic-druggies are supermen.” It should be no surprise that COM shots are less likely to stop a raging nut because their nervous response is likely blunted from all that epinephrine. But, in a defensive situation against a psycho, you should at least try to hit the chest first. It's still effective in most cases.

#3 “Why not shoot them (people) in the leg?” I hear this question all the time. Shooting the leg is a lousy idea. Let’s start with the basics:
a. A leg shot does not have a high probability of stopping someone. It is less likely to induce neurologic shock than a chest shot (see above) and, contrary to popular belief, does not render the leg muscles useless in most cases.
b. A leg is a harder shot under stress.
c. Should the bullet hit the big femoral artery near the groin the person may bleed a great deall. While the bleeding itself may cause morbidity it will happen over a longer period of time. In the meanwhile they’re still a threat to you until the blood-loss catches up to them.

People appalled by this rationale see it as a justification for killing. Not true. Here’s the part that people (gun-owners and non-gun-owners) should understand:

Only in a situation that requires you stop an imminent threat by violent means should you even present (draw) your firearm. This means that a gun should not be brandished “as a threat” or used in an encounter where such a threat is non-existant. If you are armed and you see someone stealing your car - just let it go. By any responsible standard only a complete moron would draw their weapon. Leave it to your insurance.

However, if someone is charging at you with the intent of strangling you then, as long as you feel your life is threatened you would be justified in using your weapon to defend yourself in the fashion consistent with your training. It doesn’t matter if the other person has a weapon. This doesn’t mean you HAVE TO draw your weapon, either. The choice is yours But if you draw it - USE IT!

Let's recap:

1. Don't even present a gun unless you're going to use it.
2. Only use it in the case of imminent mortal danger to you or a loved one.
3. To use it properly put two quick shots (4-5inches apart is optimal) to the thoracic region (chest).
4. If the subject is still a threat then place the next round right between the eyes (Do not shoot the forhead - the frontal portion of the skull is very hard - penetration will likely be suboptimal and a glancing shot can easily ricochet off the skull).

10-14-2004, 12:18 PM	#1 (permalink)
longbough Soylent Green is people. Location: Northern California	Defensive shooting Whenever there's a discussion about defensive handgunning the public seems to be awash in more mythology than fact. This seems to be true for many gun owners as well as non-gun owners. So here're some basic facts I thought everyone ought to know. With the exception of a good, penetrating head-shot most handgun caliber bullets are rarely capable of killing someone on the spot. But the sole objective of using a gun in defense is not to "kill" but to “stop” a target that presents an imminent threat. Two shots from a .45 to the chest has a high probability of stoppng a target only because of the neurological shock from acute traumatic injury to vital organs such as the heart and lungs. While such injuries may eventually result in death the intent is to incapacitate target so that it is no longer a threat. The myths: #1. “The cops didn’t have to shoot the subject 41 times.” Yes and no. If the body doesn't produce a reflexive neurocirculatory collapse after two rounds to the chest then the subject will still be standing. How can this happen? Under great stress extreme levels of epinephrine in an individual might be enough to “protect” them from shock. In a sense it acts to "override" the reflexive response. Often the subject is oblivious to the fact that they've been shot. The simple rule is that, if those first two rounds don’t do the trick, then the next one will have to be to the head. Then why don't cops go for the "head shot" after a "failure to stop"? Police officers are trained to shoot center of mass. I suspect it’s because it would be “politically incorrect” for the public to know that each cop is trained to deliver head-shots. The public wouldn’t stand for it. While COM shots can be 96% effective there’s still 4% left standing. #2. “Psychopaths and psychotic-druggies are supermen.” It should be no surprise that COM shots are less likely to stop a raging nut because their nervous response is likely blunted from all that epinephrine. But, in a defensive situation against a psycho, you should at least try to hit the chest first. It's still effective in most cases. #3 “Why not shoot them (people) in the leg?” I hear this question all the time. Shooting the leg is a lousy idea. Let’s start with the basics: a. A leg shot does not have a high probability of stopping someone. It is less likely to induce neurologic shock than a chest shot (see above) and, contrary to popular belief, does not render the leg muscles useless in most cases. b. A leg is a harder shot under stress. c. Should the bullet hit the big femoral artery near the groin the person may bleed a great deall. While the bleeding itself may cause morbidity it will happen over a longer period of time. In the meanwhile they’re still a threat to you until the blood-loss catches up to them. People appalled by this rationale see it as a justification for killing. Not true. Here’s the part that people (gun-owners and non-gun-owners) should understand: Only in a situation that requires you stop an imminent threat by violent means should you even present (draw) your firearm. This means that a gun should not be brandished “as a threat” or used in an encounter where such a threat is non-existant. If you are armed and you see someone stealing your car - just let it go. By any responsible standard only a complete moron would draw their weapon. Leave it to your insurance. However, if someone is charging at you with the intent of strangling you then, as long as you feel your life is threatened you would be justified in using your weapon to defend yourself in the fashion consistent with your training. It doesn’t matter if the other person has a weapon. This doesn’t mean you HAVE TO draw your weapon, either. The choice is yours But if you draw it - USE IT! Let's recap: 1. Don't even present a gun unless you're going to use it. 2. Only use it in the case of imminent mortal danger to you or a loved one. 3. To use it properly put two quick shots (4-5inches apart is optimal) to the thoracic region (chest). 4. If the subject is still a threat then place the next round right between the eyes (Do not shoot the forhead - the frontal portion of the skull is very hard - penetration will likely be suboptimal and a glancing shot can easily ricochet off the skull).