|
I'm up in the air. Im am against life birth abortions - aka partial birth abortions.
Why?
"For the most part, the abortion industry stopped using saline and prostaglandin procedures because of the number of live births. A live birth means you have to let the baby die, or dispose of it in some distasteful way. Most second and third trimester abortionists use the D&E method, (dilation and evacuation) The abortionist uses large forceps to crush the baby inside the mother's uterus and removes it in pieces. The side effects of live births and the mother going through labor are avoided. But it is a horrible procedure in which the baby must be re-constructed outside the uterus to be certain all the parts have been removed."
Carol Everett, former owner of 2 abortion clinics and director of 4, on the abortion procedure. Quoted in an interview with her in the "Human Life Alliance Advertising Supplement" 1994. (Ms. Everett was busted for having her clinics knowingly perform abortions on nonpregnant women, at a great risk of causing damage to the cervix and future miscarriages)
I understand its a slippery slope- Womans rights etc. But at a certain point- isnt that a baby? At 9 monthes it could survive outside a mothers womb, so dont tell me it couldnt survive w/o the mom therefore its a part of her.
When you stick forceps INTO the mother to crush the babies skull - its abortion- but if its 6 inches out - then its murder? Common people-
atleast keep partia lbirth abortions illegal!!!!!
|