View Single Post
Old 10-10-2004, 03:16 PM   #14 (permalink)
CunningLinguist
Upright
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ilow
Allright I have to step in here. This is a ridiculous statement, firstly because it is completely untrue, and secondly because it is appearing on a street racing thread. The "facts" are that millions of heterosexuals have died of AIDS of are living with HIV. It's difficult to argue that you're not going through life with "blinders" on when you make statements like this.

Ok, perhaps I wasn't clear enough... Heterosexual, non-drug users. The facts are that there is much less risk to that group than the media would have had you believe. Compare people having heterosexual intercourse to those having homosexual intercourse, swappling needles, receiving blood, etc and you'll see they encompass a much smaller percentage than most would believe.

Actually, if I remained paranoid (along with so many others) like I was back in the 80s and 90s as opposed to finally realizing that the odds aren't that extreme that I would contract the disease, wouldn't that suggest I had blinders on? My eyes have been opened, my thoughts/fears changed... Atypical for someone with blinders on.

It was a statement of risk and overinflated hype. It was simply a point. Don't lie, BS and manipulate people and they'll be more likely to follow you.

http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/data/gsgenetica.htm

"The assumption that HIV would spread by heterosexual transmission was, to a limited extent, correct but predictions of similar spread of AIDS, as in the London Declaration of 1988, from the WHO (Mann, 1989; Sato, Chin & Mann, 1989) and by the Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens (1990) were numerically exaggerated (Table 1), as were actuarial and other projections used for planning and estimates of spread outside the original risk groups of homosexual men and drug addicts. They were particularly wrong (Table 2) in the prediction that heterosexual transmission of AIDS in the general population would give rise to a general epidemic (Anderson & May, 1987; Public Health Laboratory Service, 1990)."

Have I made my point yet? Don't argue with me just to argue...
__________________
Jason
94 3000GT VR4 (12.67 @ 105.93 & 12.802 @ 109.40)
04 EVO VIII

Last edited by CunningLinguist; 10-10-2004 at 03:19 PM..
CunningLinguist is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360