I gotta say, i was the opposite..great when clinton was in office, shitty after clinton....
Also gotta say, I don't htink any president other than bush and co...the and co bc they were the ones paving the way, have been for 8 yrs, (cheney, rummy, wolfowitz) would have gone from saying, "Ok, so bin laden attacked us....great, let's go after Iraq..." I jsut don't think it would have happened under any other group of people.
saddam was bad..well duh, who isn't, ya know...and maybe we did take out saddam in 3 weeks, but considering our military vs their perceived or real military, i would have been ashamed if it took an act of god to 'liberate iraq'...
as for discrediting the office..the only people concerned were the fundys in america...the rest of the world could not care less about our pres getting a bj...just look at international papers from the time....so i really don't htink you can say, "Well, the last president got a bj in office, so now, no country will trust the current pres, so he wasnt' able to build a coalition..." Logic just doesn't flow there...
__________________
Live.
Chris
|